Le 7 octobre 2023 aura probablement été un accélérateur de la décomposition de l’entité sioniste. Non pas en raison de ses effets militaires, somme toute limités, mais en raison de la réaction des autorités sionistes qui ont entrepris de livrer une guerre contre la population civile de Gaza au prétexte d’éliminer le Hamas.
Les alliés occidentaux d’Israël pensent-ils sortir indemnes d’une guerre généralisée ? Comment croient-ils pouvoir armer une agression contre un pays tout en restant en sécurité dans leur capitale ?
L’assaut militaire brutal d’Israël sur Gaza, en cours depuis neuf mois, bénéficie du soutien total de plusieurs États alliés de l’Occident, non seulement en fournissant à la machine de guerre de l’armée d’occupation une large gamme d’armements et de munitions, mais aussi en participant directement à l’action militaire. Les États-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne, par exemple, ont fourni des données de reconnaissance et de renseignement essentielles et ont envoyé leurs forces spéciales pour aider Israël dans ses opérations militaires.
Ten years ago, the terrorist group known as ISIS stunned the world when it seized wide swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria and declared its own caliphate.
By the time territory from that self-proclaimed caliphate was fully retaken in 2019, ISIS had terrorized civilian populations in Iraq and Syria, carried out a genocidal campaign against the Yazidi religious minority, broadcast the beheadings of journalists and aid workers, and staged deadly terror attacks in Paris, Nice, Brussels, Manchester, Turkey and beyond.
The whole point of rebranding what was first conceptualized as the “Baltic Defense Line” is to market this project as an inclusive pan-European one that’s supposedly being built for the “greater good” of the bloc’s citizens.
How the Fight Against Climate Change Can Overcome Geopolitical Discord
The clean energy transition has reached adolescence. Its future direction is not yet set, and in the meantime, its internal paradoxes make for a volatile mix. Political leaders fret that ambitious steps to address climate change will aggravate geopolitical problems in a world already troubled by wars and humanitarian crises. Governments worried about energy security after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have advocated for strategies that embrace both fossil fuels and clean alternatives, lest dependence on imported oil give way to reliance on imported lithium. Rising inflation and economic slowdowns, too, are exacerbating concerns that the energy transition will lead to job losses and price hikes. The warnings are coming in quick succession. In March, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink championed “energy pragmatism” in his most recent annual letter, and a few weeks later, a JPMorgan Chase report called for a “reality check” about the transition away from fossil fuels. In April, Haitham al-Ghais, the secretary-general of OPEC, wrote that the energy transition would require “realistic policies” that acknowledge rising demand for oil and gas.
Israel has no military options that could achieve a better result than a negotiated solution or a return to the status quo.
As tensions have risen in the border area between Lebanon and Israel, many observers are predicting that Hezbollah and the Israeli military will soon be at war. On June 26, several governments began advising their citizens to leave Lebanon. Certainly, there is a high likelihood that some escalation will happen in the coming weeks, but for now we’re still not in the final stages of the build-up to a Lebanese-Israeli apocalypse.
On entend souvent, dans la bouche des rabbins, que l’antisémitisme est la jalousie de celui qui n’a pas été choisi par Dieu — une sorte de complexe de Caïn.
Jacques Attali propose une variante plus subtile : «l’antisémitisme trouve sa source principale dans la détestation de celui à qui on voudrait ne rien devoir.» Que doivent les chrétiens aux juifs ? Dieu. Avant les juifs, nous ne connaissions pas Dieu. Grâce à eux, nous Le connaissons. Notre dette est incommensurable. Ça nous énerve.
Polish filmmaker Konrad Szolajski’s new documentary looks at nearly a decade of Russian sabotage, espionage and disinformation across Central and Eastern Europe, with an eery actuality.
“Putting the whole project together took a lot of time – it was very difficult,” Konrad Szolajski explains as we meet a few hours before the international premiere of his new documentary, Putin’s Playground, in Prague on June 10.
Dans l’histoire des sociétés humaines, la concentration du pouvoir entre les mains d’une minorité privilégiée est un phénomène récurrent qui soulève des questions fondamentales sur la nature du pouvoir, la justice sociale et les fondements de la démocratie. Les oligarchies, ces systèmes où une élite restreinte exerce une influence disproportionnée sur la vie politique et économique d’un pays, incarnent cette tendance à la cristallisation du pouvoir.
There seems to be a hidden hand that pushes the players, and not anyone you would think of at first.
Over the last few months, we are witnessing a long line of assassinations of mainly top operatives, allegedly performed by Israeli units, acting in Lebanon, Syria and Iran. This should not boggle our minds, nor should we doubt the incentive. But something has changed, not in motivation and not in resolve, but in essence. The front page is clear and says as follows: Iran has masterminded the Attack on Israel and now it’s payback time. But Iran has been a nemesis for decades, and the list of targets makes no real sense, at least not at first.