reflectiigeopolitice.ro

“[T]here are people who suffer genuine anti-Muslim hatred, bigotry, and discrimination based on their faith or perceived identity. This must always be challenged and addressed, as it undermines pluralism and social cohesion. On the other hand, Islamist organizations have deliberately weaponized the term Islamophobia to shut down scrutiny of their ideology and political activities. By labeling criticism of Islamist ideas or networks as ‘Islamophobic,’ they deliberately blur the line between protecting people and protecting an ideology. This is why Islamophobia is the wrong term—it places an ideology beyond criticism rather than safeguarding individuals from hatred.” — From “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Entryism Into the United States: A Systemic Analysis,” a report by the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, 2025.

An environmental knowledge commons could support evidence-based policymaking, but it will require long-term coordination across the many communities monitoring pollution and local conditions.

In the northern part of the San Francisco Bay Area, four communities are simultaneously navigating the past and future of energy. At oil refineries in Richmond and Martinez, it’s business as usual. Recently, Chevron Richmond and PBF Energy-owned Martinez Refining Company (MRC) have battled state regulators over stricter emissions rules. MRC has had a string of notable accidents and toxic dust releases that have worried and angered nearby residents, who have watchdogged the refineries for decades.

One of the biggest difficulties for politicians and pundits trying make sense of changes in the world is what I call the Problem of Classification. Most apparently sudden and violent changes have three common characteristics. The first is that they are not, in fact, sudden, but have been building up for a long time, often unnoticed and so not understood. The second is that some event, often unexpected, has intervened to suddenly make these changes which were previously hidden now obvious. The third is that in almost all cases, the changes obey simple rules which have been in force for millennia, but are not usually discussed in textbooks of politics and international relations.

Discord between Western allies — ostensibly due to contrasting views towards Islam and Israel — has recently escalated to a new height. Its core most likely consists of a deep-seated envy that a handful of scruffy, hunted people managed to transform a land of sand dunes, deserts and malarial swamps into a gleaming superpower — all while defending themselves against unrelenting neighboring countries trying to snuff them out. Such an achievement must, of course, be punished.

I. Le paradoxe central
Posons le problème dans toute sa rigueur.

La Transcendance, telle que nous l’avons définie, est le Tout-Autre – radicalement inaccessible, non-conceptualisable, hors d’atteinte de tout concept, de tout désir, de toute saisie. Rien dans l’ordre du manifesté ne peut l’atteindre, la contenir ou l’épuiser.

En matière de politique, Trump n’est pas maître de ses propres décisions : il n’est que le porte-parole chargé de mettre en œuvre une stratégie recourant à des moyens peu recommandables ; une stratégie visant à maintenir une hégémonie qui finira par s’attaquer à la Chine et à la Russie – et qui échouera probablement, car les États-Unis ont commis d’énormes erreurs d’appréciation.

Dans un contexte marqué par la surcharge informationnelle, les crises à répétition et la fragmentation des repères, une question s’impose de plus en plus : sommes-nous encore réellement aux commandes de nos décisions ?

C’est autour de cette interrogation centrale que s’articule cet entretien avec Jean-Jacques Crèvecœur, auteur, conférencier et formateur, qui consacre depuis plus de quarante ans ses travaux à la compréhension des mécanismes de pouvoir, de manipulation et de conscience individuelle.