Les « élites » autoproclamées de Davos ont peur. Tellement peur. Lors des réunions du Forum économique mondial de cette semaine, le maître à penser Klaus Schwab – qui a joué son rôle de méchant de James Bond – n’a cessé de répéter un impératif catégorique : nous avons besoin de « coopération dans un monde fragmenté ».
Un monde fragmenté ?
Ce concept stupide et ne reflétant aucune réalité c’est selon… l’unique point de vue des USA. Sa non-pensée répétitive effacerait toutes les autres pensées, celles du vaste monde. Mais « effacées » que sur les médias vendus seulement, médias aussi relayés sur internet. Et pas dans le concret de la vraie vie… Pendant ce temps, la nouveauté devient que tous les rouages de cette foutaise seront démontés. Et certains nous feront même revenir aux rires frais, spontanés et libérateurs.
Analyse et réponse ironique á l’interview du général Yakovleff sur Air et cosmos
Comme le disait Sun Tzu : « Qui connaît l’autre et se connaît, en cent combats ne sera point défait ; qui ne connaît l’autre mais se connaît, sera vainqueur une fois sur deux ; qui ne connaît pas plus l’autre qu’il ne se connaît sera toujours défait. » (chapitre 3)
One of the best-known quotes was “where’s the beef?“ from Clara Peller who was a manicurist and American character actress who, at the age of 81, starred in the 1984 advertising campaign for the Wendy’s fast food restaurant chain.
PATH est une organisation non gouvernementale à peine perçue par le courant dominant et la population, mais qui brasse des millions ! Des fondations telles que la Fondation Bill & Melinda Gates et des entreprises pharmaceutiques renommées sont à l’origine de cette organisation.
The Pentagon had a very merry Christmas but all the American taxpayers got was a lump of coal.
The U.S. Congress passed an omnibus spending bill that awarded the Pentagon $45 billion more than originally requested – a record $816.7 billion dollars – out of $858 billion for the national defense establishment. The Veteran’s Administration, which is really just deferred defense spending, requested $301.4 billion, and the Intelligence Community budget request includes $26.6 billion for the Military Intelligence Program. There’s also probably something squirreled away at the Department of Homeland Security, but you get the picture.
A majority of the World Economic Forum’s Community of Chief Economists expect a global recession in 2023, see geopolitical tensions continuing to shape the global economy, and anticipate further monetary tightening in the United States and Europe. These are the key findings of the Chief Economists Outlook, launched Monday at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland.
Predictions are a notoriously painful exercise. In the world of geopolitics, especially during a time of seismic global transformation, they are nigh near impossible to make.
In West Asia, a depressed and neglected region that acts as a punching bag for Great Power competition elsewhere, much relies on the settlement of major power battles in the realms of economy, politics, and (proxy) war.
Data suggests that US dollar reserves in central banks are dwindling, as is the influence of the US on the world economy. This presents a unique opportunity for regional currencies and alternative payment systems to enter the vacuum.
The imposition of US trade restrictions and sanctions against a number of nations, including Russia, Iran, Cuba, North Korea, Iraq, and Syria have been politically ineffectual and have backfired against western economies. As a result, the US dollar has been losing its role as a major currency for the settlement of international business claims.
Predictions about the future of war follow narratives and intellectual fashions. At the beginning of the millennium, the emergence of high-tech drones—the U.S. military’s all-seeing eyes in Afghanistan—fueled futuristic visions of battles contested by robots and computers. By the mid-2010s, the success of Russian information operations, election interference, and weaponized corruption in Europe and the United States had given rise to the idea that even a major country could be controlled without the use of force. Others thought that mutual dependence on trade and commerce in a globalized age would render a major war unlikely—or keep it locally contained.