Current concepts and terminology on multilateralism are confusing and inconsistent. Moreover, multilateralism in practice is in one of its biggest crises in (at least) decades. Conceptually, clarity needs to be created here, among other things with an appeal for comprehensive omnilateralism – in compliance with universal frameworks, as alternatives to such a reinvigorated comprehensive and vivid omnilateralism (and a likewise multilateralism) are rare if we do not want to end up in Thomas Hobbes’ bellum omnium contra omnes again.
(thesis to the New Science Program) Exhaustion of modern science
The program of the new science is necessary, because the old science of the New time has exhausted itself, it is simply immoral and completely unfounded delusion, which has no relation at all to the truth and being of the world around us with all its contents. Modern scientific institutions have become purely economic corporations because even a hint of the search for the truth about the world in them is abolished.
With the following methodological requirements, it is usually reduced to the equalment of scientists of the most different profiles to a certain, as authoritative for them as much as authoritative for them, the “conceptual bar” is met by the criterion of the scientific or artifacts of certain artifacts, judgments and more private hypotheses. The formula of this understanding of methodology gave A. N. Whitehead (1861-1947). This prominent English philosopher, speaking of the method, which generates significant knowledge, explained it as a necessity to reliance on the “connective logical and necessary system of general ideas,” in terms of which each element of our experience could be interpreted. And the problematicness of this understanding of methodologicalism is associated with a possible inconsistency of the “connective logical and necessary system of general ideas” real factology, and, therefore, the requirements of scientificity.
Personality and Individual: The distinction of concepts
The concept of a total toiler as a stock figure of the history of the economy can be supplemented by the formula “economic personality.” The economic personality is an all-total (integral) worker. In this case, the focus is on the personality in its anthropological interpretation (primarily at the French school of Durkheim-Moss [1] and F.Boas’s followers in the United States). Here the personne is opposed to the individual (l?individu), since the personality is something social, social, complex and artificially created in contrast to the individual, representing the atomic nature of the individual human being without any additional characteristics. The individual is the product of subtracting the personality from man, the result of the liberation of the human unit from any connections and collective structures. The person consists of the intersection of various forms of collective identity, which can be represented as roles (in sociology) or as finization (in anthropology). Personality exists and makes sense only in relations with society. Personality is a set of functions, as well as the result of a conscious and meaningful creativity of a person’s identity. Personality is never a given; it is a process and a task. The identity is constantly being built, and in the course of this construction it is established, ordered or, on the contrary, the world around the world is destroyed and chaoticized.
Le 2 avril est commémoré en République argentine le Jour des Vétérans et des Morts de la guerre des Malouines. Ce jour-là, il y a généralement de multiples activités, dont certaines n’ont pas pu être réalisées cette année en raison de la visite de la Commandante du Commandement Sud des États-Unis d’Amérique. On lui a demandé de changer la date, mais la demande a été refusée, mettant en lumière deux choses : premièrement, l’arrogance impériale des États-Unis et deuxièmement, la docilité et l’extrême soumission du gouvernement argentin. Il faut se rappeler que lors de la Guerre des Malouines, les États-Unis ont trahi le Traité d’Assistance Réciproque des Amériques (TIAR) et par là même l’Argentine, en soutenant ouvertement le Royaume-Uni avec une logistique et une intelligence qui ont été fondamentales dans la défaite du pays du Sud en 1982.
World events serve as a stage of constant search for how best to construct and maintain society, which is an underlying theme of some decades ago found in the works of Herbert Marcuse, 1898–1979, German-American philosopher of prominent fame during the 1960s considered an intellectual giant of his time.
Charles Reitz, widely recognized as a scholar of Herbert Marcuse, has brought to life his ideology for a prosperous healthy society, proposing that “nature is an ally” in his book The Revolutionary Ecological Legacy of Herbert Marcuse, 284 pgs. Daraja Press, 2023.
Rather than a new phenomenon, competition, and hence the possibility of conflict, between states – as well as cooperation – has existed as long as states have interacted. While the particularities of great power competition have ebbed and flowed over the past decades, the twenty-first century has seen a return to “normal” as competition between states has translated into open conflict, such as the war in Ukraine, while interdependence due to globalization, renders inter-state conflicts, as well as strategic rivalries, increasingly complex. Even as the US is redefining its engagement with the world and the US and China are geopolitical facts no country can ignore, other countries will not necessarily be constrained to a binary, fully aligned with one over the other. Rather, states, including throughout the Global South, will likely pursue policies that still maximize their strategic national autonomy within the constraints of their respective realities.
Les dirigeants occidentaux vivent deux événements qui les mettent en état de stupéfaction : la défaite en Ukraine et le génocide en Palestine. Le premier est humiliant, l’autre honteux. Pourtant, ils ne ressentent ni humiliation ni honte. Leurs actions montrent clairement que ces sentiments leur sont étrangers : ils sont arrogants et méprisants, ce sont des psychopathes très dangereux.
