Reflectii

La Chine, la Russie et l’Iran : quel est leur dénominateur commun ? De toute évidence, ce sont les principaux rivaux géopolitiques des États-Unis aujourd’hui. Comme l’a récemment écrit Ross Douthat dans un article d’opinion publié dans le New York Times, intitulé «Qui est en train de gagner la guerre mondiale ?», «il est utile pour les Américains de réfléchir à notre situation en termes globaux, avec la Russie, l’Iran et la Chine comme une alliance révisionniste qui met notre puissance impériale à l’épreuve».

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing modern warfare, as seen in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Drones now cause 70–80% of battlefield casualties, with both sides developing AI-powered targeting systems. AI has boosted first-person view drone strike accuracy from 30–50% to around 80%. David Kirichenko points to the rising ethical concerns about machines making life-or-death decisions. While AI increases lethality, human involvement in logistics and final judgment remains crucial for battlefield operations. The conflict is also providing extensive battlefield data to train these systems and shape the future of warfare.

Même si officiellement aucun traité de paix n’a été signé à Anchorage, il semble que la situation du conflit ukrainien soit tout de même en voie d’amélioration. Je critique souvent Trump sur ce blog notamment sur les questions économiques, mais il est indéniable que son élection a calmé en partie la montée en tension que les néoconservateurs américains et les démocrates provoquaient. Le fait que les deux puissances nucléaires que sont la Russie et les USA se soient mis autour d’une table aurait dû être accueilli avec beaucoup plus d’enthousiasme du côté européen. Mais on voit bien que l’UE et ses petits serviteurs à commencer par notre pathétique président n’ont eu de cesse de vouloir faire capoter cette rencontre. Mais nous reviendrons sur cette question européenne par la suite.

This is technospeak for censorship, but you already knew that because this is what the “fact-checkers” at Facebook and Twitter did on behalf of the Biden administration and the FBI until Elon Musk bought Twitter and President Donald Trump was re-elected.

A recent article published in The Hill celebrated the revival of the Monroe Doctrine under Donald Trump by suggesting that U.S. pressure is displacing China from Latin America. But this view misreads both the nature of U.S. influence and the political and economic dynamics shaping the region. What we are seeing is nothing short of coercion by an empire attempting to secure its declining grip on a hemisphere that is increasingly multipolar and pragmatic in its economic policies.

At the recent annual summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), US President Donald Trump pressured member states to increase their defense spending. The alliance ultimately adopted a target for member states to increase defense spending to 5% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over 10 years. While this appears to be a shift in policy, it is more accurately a continuation of a trend that began on Feb. 24, 2022, when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. However, the rush to expand Europe’s arsenals and armies risks leaving behind one critical priority: preparedness to protect civilians if a war erupts on European soil.

«L’accord commercial américain alimentera la «désindustrialisation» de l’UE». ~ Le ministre russe des Affaires étrangères, Sergueï Lavrov

«L’Union européenne n’est plus un géant économique, mais un nain politique». ~ Le président russe Vladimir Poutine

L’Arménie a provisoirement accepté de céder la gestion du corridor de Zanguezour à une entreprise américaine, selon la publication espagnole Periodista Digital.

Ce corridor, long de 42 km, reliera l’Azerbaïdjan au Nakhitchevan, à la Turquie et à l’Asie centrale. Il s’agit en substance d’une nouvelle «route de la soie», mais sous le contrôle de Washington. Il a déjà un nom : «Pont Trump».

The combined tariff of fifty percent on Indian exports to the United States imposed by President Donald Trump should not come as a surprise, despite India’s undefined and directionless strategic partnership with the U.S. Indian liberals and their right-wing counterparts had celebrated this so-called strategic partnership with the United States. However, from technological embargoes to trade barriers, this steep tariff reflects a historical continuity of anti-India foreign policy pursued by the U.S. America was never, is not, and likely will never be a true friend to a developed and sovereign India. It has consistently pursued various forms of strategic foreign policy aimed at undermining India’s strength and independence. American racial capitalism and its ruling elites are fundamentally opposed to the idea of an independent and developed India.

A bill, H.R.3883 (Muslim Brotherhood Is a Terrorist Organization Act of 2025), was put forward on June 10, 2025 by US Senator Ted Cruz, “[to] require the Secretary of State to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization.” This designation is crucial for both US and international security. Even then, if the US government makes the FTO designation, this alone is not enough to slow down the aggression that the Muslim Brotherhood is still generating throughout the world.