Le renseignement US se couvre. Quelle est l’ampleur réelle de la guerre des États-Unis contre l’Iran ?

La guerre en Iran tourne mal & les services de renseignement américains montent au créneau pour dire : “Ne nous faites pas porter le chapeau, on vous avait prévenus”.

Commençons par la grande nouvelle du jour révélée par une fuite des services de renseignement américains au Washington Post… John Hudson et Warren P. Strobel ont obtenu l’information :

Où en sont les États-Unis avec l’Iran ?

Avec l’opération “Epic Fury”, Washington renonce à toute prétention d’“ordre fondé sur des règles”, recourant à la force pour façonner une civilisation ancienne au profit des Juifs sionistes.

En psychologie, on observe un phénomène appelé “effet Dunning-Kruger”.

Who Will Be Iran’s Next Supreme Leader?

If the succession process can be carried out as Khamenei intended, it will likely bring a hardliner into power.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s death on Saturday after U.S. and Israeli airstrikes hit his compound immediately re-invoked the succession issue inside Iran, along with threats from the U.S. president to interfere in the process. While serving as the supreme leader for almost thirty-seven years and as the longest-acting head of state in the region since the shah, Khamenei faced scrutiny and speculation for years over who he would favor as his successor.

Iran’s armed Kurdish groups are a potential ground force against Tehran

Armed Kurdish groups along Iran’s north-western border with Iraq have come into focus as a potential ground force that could move against Tehran, as the US-Israeli war continues.

Quoting Kurdish officials, AP reported that Kurdish-Iranian dissident groups in northern Iraq were getting ready for a possible operation inside Iran and that Washington has asked Iraqi Kurds to assist.

Turkey as Israel’s “next Iran”? A strategic rivalry reconsidered

When former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said that Turkey, with the support of Qatar, was replacing Iran as Israel’s major strategic threat, his words were not just another warning about another enemy. Instead, his remarks reflected a broader anxiety: Israel could be entering a period of renewed conflict with a powerful and prosperous adversary—a situation that also carries historical significance.