Reflectii

By Salim Badat

We are easily deceived. The world shows us politicians, presidents, and prime ministers, their speeches, debates, and promises dominate the headlines.

Yet these men and women are not the real masters of power. Behind them stands another force, older, quieter, but infinitely stronger: the bankers, corporations, and financial dynasties who pull the strings.

This is the economic jihad we overlook, and it is the one that truly matters. Wars are not fought for freedom or democracy; they are fought for oil, gold, gas, and control of infrastructure.

The EU’s latest proposed sanctions against Russia did not, as anticipated, include additional steps to halt pipeline imports of Russian oil and natural gas. However, the intransigence of Hungary and Slovakia over the issue is looking increasingly untenable.

In the Middle East, climate activism is often intertwined with public grievances over perceived governance failures and ongoing regional and national conflicts. Not only are Iraq and Yemen among the countries most vulnerable to climate change,1 compounded by apparent endemic state corruption, but they have also become key arenas for the ongoing regional confrontation between Israel and Iran’s axis that began in October 2023. In Iraq, for example, clashes between Iran-backed militias and U.S. and Israeli forces—a symptom of wider instability and governance failures—have enabled Türkiye and Iran to exploit the country’s water resources.2 In Yemen, Ansar Allah (commonly known as the Houthi movement) has disrupted international shipping in the Red Sea and attacked Israel, deepening the country’s isolation and insecurity. Both countries also grapple with fragmented political authority: Iraq’s federal structure includes a semiautonomous region, while Yemen remains divided among competing factions.

In the Arab states of the Gulf, Islamic institutions have long existed at the intersection of local and regional space. Before the twentieth century, local rulers tended to rely on specific scholars who were part of regional religious networks for rudimentary needs in adjudication and education. The emergence of complex bureaucratic states in the middle of the twentieth century changed this picture in a way that renegotiated the terms between global and local Islam differently for each state.

Les récits médiatiques, un complexe de supériorité et des batailles psychologiques façonnent l’avenir de l’Europe. L’image que l’Europe se fait d’elle-même comme un «jardin» l’aveugle face aux réalités mondiales, tandis que des récits irrationnels sur la guerre risquent d’accélérer son propre déclin.

Israel’s strategy in recent weeks has been to disparage the decision of several countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Yet when France, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Portugal, and Belgium, took such a step at the United Nations early this week, or indicated that they would, the Israeli and American reaction was anger. How strange, and telling, that a decision the Israelis and their advocates had ridiculed as “childish” and “performative,” even “an absurdity,” could provoke so excessive a response.

Gen Z is a generation born into a world full of anxieties—from school shootings to climate Armageddon, to a pandemic and political violence. But I’m here to give you one more thing to worry about!

A high-stakes debate about the timing of peak oil has been simmering for decades. Although few of today’s Gen Z members know much about it, their lives will be impacted profoundly by the waning of the petroleum era.

Les BRICS incarnent la transition d’un ordre néolibéral vers un système international plus multipolaire et pragmatique… Les BRICS sont en effet l’incarnation mais pas la totalité du système, c’est ce sur quoi nous insistons, ni même sa véritable dynamique. Nous sommes devant un processus qui en priorité relève d’une contradiction fondamentale, celle du rapport des êtres humains à la nature dans lequel le développement scientifique et technique est le moteur de l’ébranlement. Or ce qui caractérise cette contradiction est la manière dont les pays occidentaux, les USA en particulier qui jouissaient d’un quasi-monopole dans ce domaine n’ont cessé de délocaliser leur production matérielle, l’industrie vers les pays du tiers monde qui ont connu de ce fait un essor, et le terme d’émergent définit cette transformation.

Une critique globale du modèle d’intégration supranational de l’UE, analysant ses lacunes structurelles, économiques et géopolitiques.

Au cours des trois dernières décennies ou plus, un récit dominant a façonné le discours européen : dans un monde de plus en plus globalisé et interconnecté, les nations individuelles sont progressivement devenues limitées dans leur autonomie économique et ont perdu la capacité de déterminer indépendamment leur trajectoire économique. Cela est attribué à leur faiblesse par rapport aux puissantes forces extérieures – à la fois des entités privées telles que la finance internationale et les multinationales, ainsi que des superpuissances étrangères, en particulier la Chine. Selon ce point de vue, le concept même de souveraineté nationale est devenu de plus en plus obsolète dans le monde d’aujourd’hui.