Iran says it targeted ‘Iranian terrorist group’ in Pakistan

Tehran’s top diplomat said on Wednesday that his country’s armed forces targeted an “Iranian terrorist group” in Pakistan the day before, after Islamabad said the strike killed two children.

“On Pakistan, none of the nationals of the friendly and brotherly country of Pakistan were targeted by Iranian missiles and drones,” Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Follow Britain’s lead on banning Hizb ut-Tahrir

While the violent jihadism of ISIS and al-Qaeda have held international attention for decades, there is another Islamist group that has embedded itself in Western countries, using free-speech protections while it calls for the transformation of democracies into an Islamic caliphate – ironically free from free speech. That group is Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation (HT). Though it has been criminalized throughout the Middle East, as well as China, Germany and Turkey, HT maintains chapters in the United States, Australia, Canada, and almost 30 other mainly Western countries. On Monday, the United Kingdom announced HT had finally crossed the line and would be banned. The United States and other Western nations should follow Britain’s lead and ban HT’s insidious hateful and pro-terror propaganda.

HT evaded previous attempts by British prime ministers to criminalize it because it did not directly call for violence. The impetus for the shift in British policy was Hamas’s October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel, which killed approximately 1,200 people and resulted in Hamas taking some 240 hostages into Gaza. In response, Israel declared war against Hamas and launched a campaign to uproot the terrorist group. Worldwide, HT chapters organized propaganda and rallies in support of Gaza, defending Hamas’s October 7 attack as “resistance” and accusing Israel of genocide. During a reportedly sparsely attended HT rally for Gaza in London on October 21, attendees called for jihad. British officials accused HT of supporting terrorism and promoting antisemitism, leading Home Secretary James Cleverly on Monday to submit a draft order banning the group under the Terrorism Act of 2000, which would criminalize “belonging to, inviting support for and displaying articles in a public place in a way that arouses suspicion of membership or support for the group.” The ban could go into effect by Friday, pending parliamentary approval.

Now it is time for the rest of the world to follow suit. According to British Home Secretary James Cleverly, HT’s praise of the October 7 attacks and description of Hamas as heroes constitutes promotion of and support for terrorism. HT Britain condemned the move as a “desperate measure to censor debate about the genocide in Palestine and to stop Islam’s just political alternative.” The only thing the British ban would “censor” is praise for terrorism and calls for violence against a democratic nation. HT itself has provided clear evidence of its antisemitic and homophobic rhetoric, and—most damningly—its support for internationally designated terrorist groups such as Hamas on its chapters’ websites and social media.

HT has firmly rejected the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israel’s right to exist, while HT Britain has called on Muslim armed forces to “take immediate action to free Palestine from occupation.” HT Britain also rejected associations of Hamas’s October 7 attack with antisemitism or terrorism, claiming Israel itself is “illegal in origin and brutal in nature.” On October 9, 2023, two days after Hamas’s heinous massacre, HT’s central media office issued a statement condemning “the hostility launched by the Jewish entity since Saturday morning,” insinuating that Israel’s retaliation against Hamas occurred in a vacuum.

This is not the first time HT has professed support for terrorism. HT has long supported offensive jihad against Israel. In 2002, HT leaflets in Denmark urged Muslims to kill Jews “wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have been [sic] turned you out.” In 2003, similar antisemitic rhetoric resulted in the group being banned from many university campuses in Britain and a complete ban of the group in Germany. Despite this direct call for violence, HT largely remained legal in the West while its radical ideology influenced foreign fighters who joined ISIS and other groups. Indeed, some of the world’s most notorious terrorists have either been HT leaders themselves or attended HT events. This list includes 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, British ISIS executioner Mohammed Emwazi, a.k.a. “Jihadi John,” and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, founder of al-Qaeda in Iraq, among others.

In the United States, HT America called the October 7 Hamas attack an “alarm” for the Islamic community and a “a deliberate halt to the insidious betrayal of the region’s puppet-masters.” With respect to the recent trend of Arab normalization with Israel, HT America accused the Arab states of nearly “erasing” a century of “aggression” against the Islamic community. HT America further praised the Hamas attack for giving way to a “shift of the political atmosphere, granting hope in victory for” Allah’s servants.

HT America holds its annual Khilafah Conference in the Chicago area. Speakers at HT America’s May 2023 conference declared the dangers of the “LGBT agenda” and how the Islamic community must push back against the LGBT threat to “dismantle” families and “corrupt” communities. Other speakers over the years have spoken out against democracy, capitalism, feminism, secularism, and Western liberal values—all while ironically using the right to free speech to project their vitriol. While HT’s hateful rhetoric may be protected under U.S. free speech laws, as it does not directly call for violence, U.S. hotel chains are under no obligation to permit HT to use their facilities. For years, CEP has called on hotels and conference centers in the area to reject HT’s abuse of their facilities. Few would argue if a hotel refused to host a Ku Klux Klan convention. So, too, hotels should exercise the same discernment in rejecting HT’s use of their facilities to preach their extreme ideology. HT’s blatant support for a designated terrorist organization should be impetus enough for U.S. businesses—if not the U.S. government—to bar HT.

For years, HT has abused free speech protections to fend off attempts to criminalize it in Western countries. In 2015, HT Australia condemned newly passed anti-terrorism laws in Australia for seeking to “beat the Muslim community into submission.” Australia’s then prime minister, Tony Abbott, previously sought to ban HT in 2015, accusing HT of justifying terrorism. While Abbott acknowledged that HT didn’t directly advocate terrorism, he recognized that it made excuses for terrorist organizations. HT’s rhetoric does not simply justify terrorism, it encourages it. Fast forward to October 2023, and we clearly see HT legitimizing Hamas’s terrorism while calling on Muslim armies to attack Israel. While HT claims it is not antisemitic, its delegitimization of the Jewish state and defense of terrorism against Jews tells a very different story.

HT has demonstrated blatant support for a designated terrorist organization while openly supporting terrorist violence. The British government is finally taking the necessary steps against HT and its pernicious attempts to radicalize its Muslims against democracy and democratic values. Now is the time for the United States and other Western countries to follow Britain’s lead and ban HT.

How the War in Gaza Revived the Axis of Resistance

Iran and Its Allies Are Fighting With Missiles and Memes

On January 12, the United Kingdom and the United States launched military strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. These attacks were a response to the group’s assaults on commercial shipping in the Red Sea, which have disrupted global trade. The Houthis’ actions briefly made them the most prominent members of a military coalition that has become increasingly active across the region following the assassination of Saleh al-Arouri and other Hamas leaders in Beirut on January 2. For following their deaths, Hezbollah’s commander, Hassan Nasrallah vowed retribution and declared that the fight against Israel required nothing less than an “axis of resistance.” In the hours that followed Nasrallah’s pledge, his words were spliced into slickly produced videos and spread widely. Then the axis attacked. Hezbollah pounded Israel’s Meron air surveillance base with 62 rockets; the Iraq-based Islamic Resistance group sent drones to attack U.S. bases in Syria and Iraq and targeted the Israeli city of Haifa with a long-range cruise missile; the Houthis struck in the Red Sea; and Iran captured an oil tanker in the Gulf of Oman.

If post-neoliberalism is in trouble, we’re all in trouble

Dan Drezner has a piece in Reason, arguing that the victory of post-neoliberalism is premature.

The claims of a “post-neoliberal” paradigm rest on the belief that there is a tradeoff between resilience and efficiency, between strategic autonomy and globalization. But it seems increasingly clear these values are not mutually inconsistent. The best hope for economic resilience might come not from post-neoliberal policies but from neoliberal ones.

Israel Should Boycott Turkey

Insult is continuously added to injury. Since the October 7 terror attacks on Israel, Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used every opportunity to shore up his support for Hamas, while vilifying Jerusalem. At this juncture, it is high time for Israel to realize that it has options. It does not have to entertain Ankara’s vitriol, antisemitism and its support for terrorism—all of which undermine Jerusalem’s security on a daily basis. Israel should do what Erdogan pretends to want to do: boycott Turkish goods.

Guerre asymétrique : Pourquoi les Houthis peuvent vaincre l’Occident collectif

Les Houthis peuvent à première vue sembler largement dépassés par l’armada américano-britannique qui a frappé le Yémen, mais sur le plan militaire et économique, les États-Unis et l’Europe sont en réalité bien plus vulnérables que les Houthis. Pour le dire simplement, en termes économiques et militaires, les États-Unis, le Royaume-Uni, l’Europe et Israël ont beaucoup plus à perdre.

Guerre à Gaza : L’Iran démontre ses moyens de légitime défense

Pendant les cent jours de guerre d’Israël contre tous les habitants de Gaza, les membres de l’axe de résistance ont répondu à l’assaut.

Le Hamas à Gaza a attaqué avec succès les forces d’invasion israéliennes. Hier encore, il a lancé des missiles depuis le nord de Gaza vers Israël. Le Hezbollah au Liban a attaqué Israël à sa frontière. Des groupes de résistance irakiens ont attaqué des bases étatsuniennes en Syrie et en Irak. Les Houthis au Yémen ont attaqué des navires liés à Israël.

La renaissance d’ISIS, l’arme des États-Unis contre l’Axe de la Résistance

Est-ce une coïncidence si la plus grande organisation terroriste au monde renaît alors que les USA sont soumis à un assaut sur plusieurs fronts contre leur hégémonie en Asie de l’Ouest ?

Des sources de sécurité irakiennes mettent en garde contre un renouveau d’ISIS dans le pays, qui coïncide trop bien avec le pic des opérations de la résistance irakienne contre les bases américaines en Irak et en Syrie, et avec l’instabilité régionale croissante causée par l’assaut militaire d’Israël sur Gaza.